Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans said we are in what Keynesians call a “liquidity trap“:
A liquidity trap may be defined as a situation in which conventional monetary policies have become impotent, because nominal interest rates are at or near zero – so that injecting monetary base into the economy has no effect, because base and bonds are viewed by the private sector as perfect substitutes.
In order to make monetary policy “effective” during a recession, they say you have to stimulate the economy by creating price inflation. They create price inflation by printing money (quantitative easing or QE). This will free up all those dollars that savers are “hoarding.” What this will do, according to Krugman and Keynes, is cause people to spend because they will see that inflation is depreciating their dollars and there is no use continuing to maintain high savings. This new spending will break the “trap” and people will spend, businesses will borrow, and banks will lend. But it won’t work unless people know that the Fed really means it when it comes to creating inflation. If they think the Fed will “chicken out,” then folks will just hold on to savings during economic uncertainty and they won’t spend. So, the Fed really needs to push the money pedal hard.
This is all quite zany, but most modern economists believe it. They think that by debasing the currency they are actually creating real economic growth that will be sustained once the money pumping stops. They ignore the fact that people are doing the rational thing by paying down debt and increasing savings to prepare for the lean times. They do that by not spending as much. Thus, these economists say, we are trapped in this spiral of low consumer spending and high savings which tanks the economy. They think people are stupid so they believe they must trick savers into spending by devaluing the currency. They are right: if they create enough inflation folks will certainly want to dump deflating dollars.
These “modern” economists ignore the need to deleverage and the need for malinvested capital tied up in unprofitable ventures to be liquidated and then reinvest capital in new profitable ventures. They ignore inflation’s distortion of the economic function of the act of saving which gives false go signals to producers of higher order goods (goods that take a long time to make). They ignore the creation of a new boom-bust business cycle based on a papered over mirage of fake profits. They ignore the fact that once the inflation stops, the economy collapses again.
President Evans is a big QE guy and he has been writing a lot about it lately and he has a vote on the Fed’s policy decisions (member of FOMC). Mr. Evans favors a “targeted inflation rate” which means they will print money until they achieve their desired inflation target of about 2%. Oh, and here is the latest idea which various Fed economists have invented: the “inflation deficit.” What they mean is that they can create price inflation higher than 2% for a while because since we’ve had price inflation below the 2% target we can sort of average out to 2% inflation over time. Hey, you can never have enough inflation according to these guys.
Here’s how they think it will work:
I hope you appreciate the 13% devaluation of the dollar by 2014.
Evans cites Keynesian economist Paul Krugman, among others, as a source for research that this will work (Krugman, Paul R., 1998, “It’s Baaack: Japan’s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 137–187.) You should know that Japan tried most of the things that Krugman had recommended during their decades long slump, without success. In other words these econometricians have created models of aggregate demand and production (you are reduced to an autonomic unit) by which they think they can pull a money lever and achieve a desired outcome. As if these models have worked well lately.
QE won’t work to save the economy, but it will work to create inflation. Because of the lack of formation of real capital that savings creates and the failure to deleverage the economy, we will experience stagflation instead of the desired robust real economic growth.
This should give you a bit of a pause when you consider the quality of economic thinking coming out of the Fed. If you trust the Fed, you shouldn’t. The only frame of reference these guys have is some form of Keynesian economics. It was the Fed that got us into this mess to begin with and it is like giving the keys back to the guys who drove the bus off the cliff.

This is cargo cult thinking. Create the appearance of the inflation that goes along with an expanding economy and presume the expansion will exist by sympathetic magic. Insane.
Well said, Jeff
My thoughts exactly
Meanwhile the latest media theme is “dollar strength” simply because it may be time for other fiat currencies to be even weaker than the weakling USD.
Even if you define inflation as an increase in the market price of things, the Fed can’t create it. The whole notion of “inflation expectations” does not describe how people think. It describes how “economists” nowadays attempt to “model” people.
How many refrigerators do you own? What actions, if any, by Bernanke would cause you to go out and buy 5 more? Does anyone you know have 5 refrigerators? Toaster ovens? Microwaves? OK, people have lots of flat screen TVs, but that’s hedonism not inflation expectations!
Suffice to say, if the Fed could create inflation, they would have done so already! Unless you buy the Krugman argument that it’s simply that they didn’t do it enough?
I encourage everyone to introspect for a moment. Think of the goods you currently own. Think of you current plans (or lack thereof) regarding buying more of them. What would have to happen to make you buy more? My guess would be:
1) an increase in your income and/or net worth
2) a new need (e.g. having a child)
3) the price falls below a threshold
4) any or all of the above
Until we get to what Von Mises called the “Crack Up Boom” where people are rejecting the currency itself, no one destroys his savings because he expects inflation.
What people do, who have capital to protect, is not buy 300 pairs of shoes and 10 lawnmowers. They buy whatever asset they think will go up or which offers a yield greater than the inflation they expect. For example, copper or junk bonds.
[...] the Daily Capitalist on the apparent desire of the Fed to print money until inflation kicks in, thus “reviving” the economy: ..These “modern” economists ignore the need to [...]
[...] Fed: We Are In A Liquidity Trap Which Can Only Be Cured By Inflation (dailycapitalist.com) [...]
Interest Rates are too low, few are hording money, savings rate for people is entirely too low already. We need a reality check. The average person needs to realize to quit upgrading their cell phone ever three months, having $100 month cell phone plans, with a car payment, school loans, a mortgage they can’t afford, 3 flat screen’s. There needs to be a banking run because people are giving them their deposits and losing money due to inflation and shoe leather cots of banking. The gov’t is getting practically free loans with the treasury rates so low. That encourages reckless spending in Washington on projects with negative NPVs. The people of the United States need to realize that we need to take a step way back to go back to forward. Get Volcker back in raise interest rates up to 6%, send us into a depression where people will learn the importance of saving and living a little bit more modest. Get to the golden rule of saving so we can get back to some real technological process.