There are several indices of economic freedom published but the two best are from Cato and Heritage Foundation. I think that Cato has the better analysis. The attempt is to measure the amount of economic freedom a country has in comparison to other countries. Both measure Hong Kong as No. 1. Cato has the U.S. at 18 and Heritage at 10. Cato’s methodology is as follows:
The index measures the degree of economic freedom present in five major areas: [1] Size of Government; [2] Legal System and Security of property Rights; [3] Sound Money; [4] Freedom to Trade Internationally; [5] Regulation.
There are 24 subsets of measurement. See the list below.
In an accompanying article by Professor Richard Rahn, he notes:
The United States was known as the bastion of economic freedom for more than two centuries, and it was because of its economic freedom that the nation became the pre-eminent economic power. However, in just a few short years, the U.S. has fallen from No. 3 in 2000 (behind the city-states of Hong Kong and Singapore) to No. 8 in 2005 and to No. 18 in 2010, the last year for which complete statistics are available. Worse yet, the U.S. decline continues, and in next year’s ranking, it is almost certain to be lower.
Rahn tells us why economic freedom is so important:
A few facts will help illustrate why economic freedom is so important. The freest quartile of countries had an average per capita income of $37,691, while the least free quartile had a per capita income of just $5,188 in 2010. The freest quartile grew at an average annual rate of 3.6 percent 1990-2010, while the quartile that was least free only grew at an average rate of 1.6 percent over the same period. Life expectancy in the freest quartile was 79.5 years in 2010, as contrasted with 61.6 years in the least free quartile. Those people who are more concerned about the poor than economic growth should take note that the poorest 10 percent in the least-free quartile only had a per capita income of $1,209 in 2010, as contrasted with a per capita income of $11,382 for the poorest 10 percent in the freest quartile. Greater economic freedom is also associated with more political and civil liberties. In sum, by almost any measure of human well-being, a person is far better off being in a country with a high degree of economic freedom than in one with restricted economic freedoms.
Here are Cato’s top 22 (freest):
And here are the bottom 20:
Note that there are some countries who are not even counted on the Cato list because they have no freedom (e.g., North Korea). On the Heritage list North Korea is the baseline (least free state).
For the entire Heritage list go here. For the entire Cato list go here.

[...] Heritage and Cato talk about economic freedom declining, you know it’s bad.http://dailycapitalist.com/2012/09/18/economic-freedom-the-u-s-is-slipping/ Link excerpt: There are several indices of economic freedom published but the two best are from [...]
The Hermitage Foundation is not to be trusted (MassCare)…
Hear is the principal reason; from 1960 to 1991 the Repubcos never controlled CONgress once and only had five or six years of split control…
The Demcos (now full fledged Communists) had thirty years to evolve and destroy ALL freedoms in America…
BTW, they had helf from many a Repubcos on the way…
[...] Economic Freedom: The U.S. Is Slipping [...]
The Fraser Institute (Vancouver, Canada) just published it’s 2012 Economic Freedom of the World report.
It too, has the US at 18th place (lefty Canada at 5th).
You cant blame political parties for running rampant when the people dont keep them in check. Everyone only cares about making money and not ensuring the proper controls are in place. It’s a people problem, this country was built on democracy, when the people arent making educated decisions in tandem, it will fail. How bout the ultra-rich in this country that really arent doing anything except collecting checks. Sayonara U.S.A.
[...] Harding at the Daily Capitalist on the importance of economic freedom, and the U.S.’s slide in a couple of surveys on the [...]
Deja vu all over again
Richard Rahn, I believe, was with US Chamber of Commerce back in 1992. He was a cheerleader for the GOP “deficits don’t matter” policies and saw nothing but positives when the US debt quadrupled between 1981 and 1993. He was an advisor to Bush (Pere).
When Bill Clinton became President, Prof. Rahn advised all intelligent people to move to Hungary where there was more ‘economic freedom’ and also pull their money out of the US equity markets. I guess that he did not heed his own advice.
Plus ca change plus ca meme chose
Barry, the master of spin…
Alas for Prof. Rahn, truth alone triumphs