Bailouts Didn't Save Day, Deserve Scorn

David Wessel, I have five words for you: post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

Mr. Wessel is the Wall Street Journal’s chief economics commentator, and is often the face of the Journal on television. He wrote an article recently (“Bailouts Save Day, Win Scorn“) that laments the fact that, despite the fact that the bailouts saved the world, Mr. and Ms. America don’t believe it. In fact, he points out that Americans’ distrust of government and large corporations has grown as a result of the bailouts, something they see as unfair, and an example of cronyism between Wall Street and Washington.

He says in the article:

The world has had a terrifying brush with another Great Depression. Although the recent scare in Europe is a reminder that this isn’t over yet, it looks like we’ve escaped that—in no small measure because of taxpayer-financed bailouts and fiscal stimulus, as maligned and imperfect as they were.

Mr. Wessel is a bright guy, a star of a pro-capitalism newspaper. Yet he makes serious economic and logic errors that are not based on theory or the record. He needs a lesson in economics and epistemology (the science of how we know what we know).

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc is a Latin phrase describing a logical fallacy. The fallacy is: because A occurred and then B occurred, then A caused B. In modern behavioral economics this also coincides with the principle of “confirmation bias,” where you look for data that coincides with your desired conclusion.

There are two fallacies here. … Continue reading Bailouts Didn’t Save Day, Deserve Scorn

  • Share/Bookmark

Perfectly Useless But Very Cool

Boys and their toys. I loved this German version of Punkin Chunkin, so to speak. Another offshoot of capitalism, or, why you don’t find this kind of just-for-fun creative useless stuff in Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Zimbabwe, or east of the Dnieper. It’s a perfectly useless endeavor, but, if we can think it, we [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

The Specialization of Labor

This is very cool. It is an advertisement for Matt Ridley’s new book, The Rational Optimist. It’s a lesson in capitalism’s specialization of labor and thus, why we are better off these days.

Hat tip to Cafe [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

Avatar: The Philosophy

Q: Is Avatar a metaphor for “capitalism?” Is the rape of another planet capitalism? Is the movie left wing Hollywood schlock propaganda?

A: Yes, as James Cameron defines “capitalism.” No. Yes.

Is it also something else? Yes.

* * * * *

Here are some typical and atypical reactions [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

Capitalism Saves Lives and Haiti is Proof

Haiti is proof that capitalism saves lives. The San Francisco Loma Prieto earthquake in 1989 was also a 7.0 event but only 63 people were killed. Haiti’s lack of freedom and capitalism could not afford the life saving building techniques that capitalist countries benefit from.

* * * * *

I received [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

Is Obama's Populist Rage Valid?

President Obama used his bully pulpit on Thursday to chastise banks and bankers while announcing a punitive tax on them to assuage an angry populace. Is his rage against the big paydays justified? Not for the reasons he thinks. [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

2009: Why It Will Affect Everyone's Future For Generations To Come

This has been a phenomenal year for the economy. There have been major, fundamental changes that will affect our lives for many years to come. I don’t see these changes as a good thing for the short or long term.

These changes are generational in that they don’t occur often and they will radically impact the economy and our well-being for decades. I thought of doing a decade review because it explains so much of why we are where we are today. But so much happened this year, that I’m glad the year is over.

1. The Triumph of Keynesian Economics.

Liberals, Progressives, and Democrats were eagerly waiting for an economic crash so they could clip capitalism’s wings. They got their wish.

When the crash happened, most people, including most Conservatives, scratched their heads and said, “Yup, it’s capitalism. Bad, but necessary system. Got to control it even more.” They ran to the Keynesian-New Deal play book.

Very few economists stood against this proposition and when the Democrats acted, it was right out of the Keynesian playbook: keep interest rates low, flood the economy with credit, pass spending bills to implement fiscal stimulus, and adopt more stringent rules to regulate financial institutions.

This is a result of 70 years of Keynesian economics education in America and the rest of the world. Paul Samuelson, who just died, was the father of the Neo-Keynesian econometrics movement in academia, and he and his fellow Keynesians are mostly responsible for this.

My fellow free market Austrian theory economists lost their seat at the policy table, and in fact have been banished to the back room. We need to do something about this. Our well being rides on it.

2. The Failure of Keynesian Economics.

The only problem with Keynesian theory and its policy applications is that it doesn’t work.

I am not unaware that many commentators and economists are pointing to recent “Green Shoots” as proof that Keynesian policies work, but it doesn’t. By their own admission, at least according to Paul Krugman and many other Keynesians, the fiscal stimulus has been insufficient to bring about a lasting recovery. Krugman worries about a second collapse when the stimulus runs out. He’s right.

What we are seeing in the economy that is labeled “recovery” comes from two things:

a. The temporary effect of federal spending from the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; and

b. Normal recovery behavior that occurs after every crash and that is unrelated to fiscal stimulus.

Much to the chagrin of our Economic Czars there are nagging problems of deep concern. Unemployment. Falling asset values, especially in the real estate market. Lack of bank liquidity and bank failures. Lack of credit. Falling consumer consumption and rising savings. “But, it’s supposed to work, dammit!” Keynesian theory was supposed to open the liquidity trap, create jobs, and stoke the economy by taking my money and give it to someone else to spend. It didn’t work in Japan and it isn’t working here.

The stimulus won’t last.

3. New Deal v. 2.0.

The Washington–Wall Street Economics Complex is in full swing.

Too Big To Fail has been the motto of this Administration (as well as the last one). As always there are many political strings tied to economic policy coming out of Washington. While TBTF is not this year’s story, the bankruptcy and bailout of GM and Chrysler in 2009 is. It is a bailout of the UAW and other auto industry unions and nothing more.

The bailout of the banks and major financial institutions is just the same. Yes, Citi didn’t fail and AIG was taken over, but this temporary relief will just stall a recovery. Bankrupt institutions must fail; otherwise their balance sheets will remain fouled and valuable capital will be lost, mired in unprofitable loans.

The Administration and Congress are now putting forward new legislation to further regulate businesses and financial companies. These new laws are not re-regulations, but are increased regulations that will give the federal government even more control over the economy. By asserting itself further into commerce in order to wield greater power, the center of power has moved farther from the money and commercial centers like NYC, Chicago, and L.A. into Washington, D.C.

These policies are political expediencies and work to undermine the best interests of the American people because they reward the very companies that ought to fail. It will delay economic recovery by propping up essentially bankrupt companies who are now relegated to begging Washington for more money.

It will be a boon for lawyers. … Continue reading 2009: Why It Will Affect Everyone’s Future For Generations To Come

  • Share/Bookmark

The Economic Impact of Deficits

By Jeff Harding.

This video was sent to me by Dan Mitchell at Cato. Dan presents an excellent summary of why government spending is harmful to the economy and prosperity. Whether or not it results in deficits, the greater the spending by government as a percentage of GDP, the greater is the negative impact on the [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

New Stock Exchange Opens in Africa

By Jeff Harding.

A “stock exchange” for piracy is something to consider. I hesitated before I published this article because the usual types will no doubt say that this is laissez-faire capitalism (“See what happens when you don’t have any government regulations”). So the purpose of this article is to show that the activities [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

A Cold War Cartoon

By Jeff Harding.

Here’s a bit of nostalgia from 1948. A cartoon from Harding College (no relation) extolling the virtues of capitalism. It’s a bit corny and jingoistic, but it’s fun and worth watching. 1948 was the beginning of the Cold War and the feeling at the time was “us vs. them.”  The USSR [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

Rose Friedman Dies at 98

By Jeff Harding

One of the first major influences on me as a semi-educated young man was Capitalism and Freedom by Milton Friedman. Published in 1962, it was a powerful statement for free markets and personal freedom. The book smashed commonly held beliefs that capitalism was an evil force that served to keep people poor and oppressed. Point by point Milton presented facts that supported his thesis that capitalism was just the opposite: the only world force that brought about prosperity and personal freedom. I still have a dog eared copy from the ’60s around somewhere.

Rose collaborated with Milton in their wonderful book and television series on PBS, Free to Choose. It was a vehicle for Milton to demonstrate his powerful intellect, wit, and charm as an advocate for capitalism. The series would be worth watching again.

I never got to meet the Friedmans; my loss. Rose was equal to Milton in many ways and was his collaborator throughout their professional life.

I have noticed that the libertarian or free market community is no different than many other political and social movements: there is lots of disagreement among the various factions that coalesce around capitalism as a movement. It is especially so in communities where a high level of intellectual toil is required to get into the subject, which is how I would characterize the libertarian movement. Advocates range from conservatives, old and new, to anarcho-capitalists and anarchists, not to mention the various schools of thought in economics such as the disputes between the Austrian and Chicago schools of thought.

I recall stories that Mises (Austrian) couldn’t stand Friedman (Chicago), dismissing him as a “socialist” while Friedman rejected out of hand Mises’ a priori epistemology. I don’t know if these stories are quite accurate, but I have held many discussions over the years with all stripes, and they all have looked down at each other.

While I side with the Austrian school of economic thought, I praised and admired Milton for his vast contributions to the struggle for freedom and capitalism, perhaps its greatest public advocate in the latter Twentieth Century. Along with Milton, I must praise Rose.

For those of you who wish to read more about the Friedmans’ contributions, I suggest this article at the Reason Foundation.

This is the obituary from the Friedman Foundation: … Continue reading Rose Friedman Dies at 98

  • Share/Bookmark

Apple 3G S: One Million Units in 3 Days!

Apple Inc. said it sold more than a million units of its iPhone 3G S in the first three days, defying predictions that it wouldn’t reach the level of its predecessor’s launch.

Apple also said Monday that six million customers downloaded its new iPhone 3.0 software in the first five days since its [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

Failure of the Anglo-Saxon Business Model

Why do they pick on the poor Angles and Saxons?

It seems to be open season on Angles and Saxons. Our European friends say that the “Anglo-Saxon business model” is too dangerous to the world for it to continue as it is. 

“Self-regulation is finished, laisser faire is finished, the idea of an all powerful market which is always right is finished,” says France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy. “The US will lose its status as the superpower of the world financial system,” says Peer Steinbruck, Germany’s finance minister.

Alfred Gusenbauer, the Federal Chancellor of Austria, recently wrote this stinging comment on the Anglo-Saxon Neo-Liberal model:

Anglo Saxon standard

[A]bsolute freedom for the market will lead to Rockefeller’s dog getting the milk that a poor child needs for healthy development … This distributional quandary lies at the heart of the capitalist system, which is one of never-ending competition fueled by the drive to maximise profits. In such a world, there is no room for a social conscience.

This is coming from a country that may go bankrupt for making loans to Russia and Eastern Europe equal to 85% of its GDP. … Continue reading Failure of the Anglo-Saxon Business Model

  • Share/Bookmark